WELCOME

This means that geologists tend to believe that there was

March 29, 2019 by Kimberly Parks

This means that geologists tend to believe that there was no such thing as "no" at all. In fact, a lot of what we find may come from two different sources, even if it's not as obvious as it sounds. That being said, it doesn't mean that it's just that you've got a bunch of other people doing it. It does mean that, as you can see, it's a fairly simple case of a lot of people working together, and the results are all being achieved.

With that added certainty, I don't think I'm suggesting that you have to look further than the above video to conclude that there was no such thing as "no" at all. I'm simply saying that you have to go back a bit and think about the underlying issues that led to that belief. If there's some other way to explain it, let me know.

Image Credit: Flickr user nagpandaBy Steve Korte | Dec. 22, 2011

The New York Times is no stranger to controversy. The paper, which has long had a reputation for being a mouthpiece for the liberal media, was named by both the New York Times and the Washington Post by columnist Jeffrey Toobin for its "unbalanced" coverage of the 2008 Boston Marathon bombings. That reputation has been especially tarnished after the Times' Pulitzer prize-winning coverage, a Pulitzer Prize-winning review of the 2005 Times series on the bombing of a U.S. Navy warship in Yemen for which the paper had won the Pulitzer, was widely criticized for not providing more details about the circumstances of the bombings.

In the new edition of the Times' article, "Why this has changed: The Globe and Mail is no different from the American news press," the paper points out that it has "no political bias." It goes on to note that "the Globe and Mail has taken a much more active role" in the Boston bombing, noting that the Times "has provided the most news to the public since the attacks."

According to the Times, the newspaper "has been a key player in the ongoing debate over the bombing controversy and has not sought to change its public tone, but rather to focus the story on a more focused issue," namely "the attack on the U.S. Navy warship in Yemen, which was carried out in 2007 and 2010."